The Full Story of Helen Hulick – The Woman Who Fought for the Right to Wear Pants


-1

In 1938, in Los Angeles, there was a young 29-year-old kindergarten teacher named Helen Hulick. She witnessed two men breaking into a home and was called to court to testify against them. What happened next turned her into a symbol of women’s rights—completely unexpectedly.

First Court Appearance — November 9, 1938

Helen arrived at the Los Angeles courtroom wearing pants.
At that time, women were still expected to wear dresses or skirts, especially in court. Pants on women were considered “improper.”

When she stood ready to testify, Judge Arthur S. Guerin stopped the trial.
He refused to let her speak and postponed the case for five days.

The reason?

He didn’t like that she was wearing pants.

Helen was shocked. She told a reporter from the Los Angeles Times:

“Tell the judge I’m standing up for my rights. If he tells me to wear a dress, I won’t. I like wearing pants. They’re comfortable.”

Second Hearing — Helen Stands Her Ground

Five days later, Helen returned to court.
Again, she wore slacks—deliberately—to show she would not give in.

The judge became angry. In court he said:

  • Last time she was dressed “like this,” everyone was paying attention to her.
  • Even the prisoners were distracted, he complained.
  • He reminded her he had ordered her to wear “proper women’s clothing.”
  • She had returned “in pants again, clearly refusing to obey.”

He warned her to prepare for punishment.

Third Appearance — And Jail

Helen refused to back down. She appeared in court again in pants.

This time, Judge Guerin found her in contempt of court for disobeying his dress order.
He sentenced her to five days in jail—not for any crime, but for wearing pants.

Newspapers across America picked up the story. Many people were shocked that a woman could be jailed simply because of her clothing.

The Appeal — Justice at Last

Helen’s lawyer filed an appeal.
A higher court reviewed the case and ruled that the judge had been wrong. They overturned his decision.

This meant Helen’s contempt charge was removed—and, most importantly:

Women gained the right to wear pants in court.

Helen never set out to start a movement, but her courage ended up challenging old-fashioned rules about how women were “supposed” to dress. Her stand became a small but important victory in the long fight for women’s rights and equality.


Like it? Share with your friends!

-1

What's Your Reaction?

Unuseful Unuseful
0
Unuseful
Useful Useful
0
Useful
hate hate
0
hate
confused confused
0
confused
fail fail
0
fail
fun fun
0
fun
geeky geeky
0
geeky
love love
0
love
lol lol
0
lol
omg omg
0
omg
win win
0
win
Mateo Elijah

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *